DOJ OPR AI Surveillance Investigation Request Texas

DOJ OPR AI surveillance investigation request Texas is documented through a formal follow-up communication to federal oversight authorities concerning a civil-rights complaint filed with the U.S. Department of Justice. Based on documented correspondence, statutory references, and preserved submission content, this article establishes a structured evidentiary record. This constitutes a record derived from original communication and supporting documentation — presented without modification for transparency, accountability, and review.

Overview:

The following section preserves the original communication as an evidence layer — no edits, summaries, or modifications have been made to the underlying document. This constitutes a record of submission as reflected in the source material.

Evidence record:

My name is LeRoy Nellis II, and I am submitting this correspondence as a formal follow-up to a civil-rights complaint filed with the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division – Special Litigation Section, concerning violations that occurred during my detention at the Williamson County Jail in Georgetown, Texas (2024–2025).

This communication constitutes a formal request for internal review and investigation. The attached filing documents that Williamson County Jail, operating under an Intergovernmental Service Agreement (IGSA) with the U.S. Marshals Service, has implemented AI-enabled surveillance systems that continuously record, analyze, and transmit detainee communications and behavioral data into federal systems, including NCIC, TCIC, and CJIS.

These activities are documented as occurring without judicial authorization and include the capture of attorney–client communications, raising substantial concerns regarding:

- Privileged communications - Due process protections - Fourth Amendment privacy rights - Sixth Amendment right to counsel

Because these systems operate within a federal–local framework, this matter falls within the jurisdiction of the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) and federal oversight authorities.

Request for investigation:

The scope and authorization of AI-enabled surveillance and data-collection systems under any Williamson County–U.S. Marshals Service IGSA agreements. Whether any federal personnel, agents, or contractors accessed, reviewed, or utilized data collected through these systems. Compliance with:

- Federal Wiretap Act (18 U.S.C. §§ 2510–2523) - CJIS Security Policy - Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. § 552a)

Jurisdictional and Constitutional Scope:

Accordingly, this matter constitutes a record of potential constitutional violations appropriate for federal civil-rights oversight and internal review.

Request for acknowledgment:

Please confirm receipt of this correspondence and provide any case number, reference ID, or tracking information associated with this request. I am prepared to provide supporting documentation, affidavits, technical analysis, and additional evidence upon request.

“This communication constitutes a formal request for internal review and investigation.”

What the Record Shows:

The follow-up correspondence escalates the complaint into a formal request to the Office of Professional Responsibility to investigate AI surveillance at Williamson County Jail — documenting that the surveillance operates without judicial authorization, captures attorney–client communications, and feeds federal databases while sitting outside the notice, consent, or recourse the detainee is supposed to receive. The record supports an internal review of whether any federal personnel or agents reviewed that data, whether CJIS Security Policy was followed, and whether the IGSA itself authorizes the breadth of capture described. The page does not predict an outcome. It makes the filing visible, so that when the answer comes — if it comes — the record will already show exactly where the request started.

Closing record statement:

This document is presented as a structured record based on preserved correspondence and referenced federal complaint filings. It reflects the presence of communication, allegations, and requested actions without modification or interpretation. This record is maintained for transparency, evidentiary continuity, and public reference. The current version supersedes prior versions and will be updated as additional responses, oversight actions, or official documentation become available.

Respectfully, LeRoy Nellis II Austin, Texas [email removed] · [phone removed]

Attachment: DOJ Civil Rights Complaint — Williamson County Jail (Exhibits A–D)