FBI Cyber Complaint | Data Intrusion Report
LeRoy Nellis says a sustained pattern of digital intrusions reached his Google account, Gmail, Google Drive, and WordPress site after he published.

A formal complaint submitted to the FBI’s Cyber Division alleges a sustained pattern of unauthorized access, data tampering, digital surveillance, and evidence destruction tied directly to the Williamson County Sheriff’s Office. The complaint says those intrusions reached LeRoy Nellis’s Google account, Gmail, Google Drive, and his WordPress website, LeRoyNellis.blog. It connects the alleged conduct to his publication of evidence documenting misconduct, medical abuse, and constitutional violations inside the Williamson County Jail. The filing frames the conduct as an attempt to obstruct justice, destroy evidence, suppress public reporting, and retaliate against him for whistleblowing and exercising constitutionally protected rights.
The complaint:
LeRoy Nellis, of Austin, Texas, addressed the complaint to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Cyber Division – Criminal Intrusion Section, at 935 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20535–0001. The document is dated November 15, 2025. Its subject line concerns cyber intrusion, data tampering, evidence destruction, and retaliation connected to the Williamson County Sheriff’s Office. The complaint states that he is submitting it regarding a sustained pattern of unauthorized access, data tampering, digital surveillance, and evidence destruction tied directly to that office. It describes the pattern as targeted, coordinated, and directly connected to his publication of evidence.
The complaint also says it supports an ongoing evidentiary record involving publication interference, account access anomalies, and system-level manipulation. The document’s overview says the filing outlines patterns of digital access, interference, and disruption consistent with coordinated activity. It identifies the matter as a federal cyber complaint and references the FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3). Related documentation named in the source includes a Master Timeline and a Systemic Failure Record. The formal complaint is preserved in full without modification, according to the source document.
What was affected:
The complaint identifies four systems and services as impacted: his Google account, Gmail, Google Drive, and his WordPress website, LeRoyNellis.blog. It says the intrusions have impacted those systems. The document supports an ongoing evidentiary record involving publication interference, account access anomalies, and system-level manipulation. Those phrases are the complaint’s own description of the scope of the digital record.
The complaint does not describe technical methods, dates of individual intrusions, or the identity of any person who carried them out. It does not state whether data was recovered, whether access was restored, or whether any system remains compromised. Those limits matter because they define what the record currently establishes and what remains unknown.
The alleged motive:
The complaint says the actions appear designed to obstruct justice, destroy evidence, suppress public reporting, and retaliate against him for whistleblowing and exercising constitutionally protected rights. It also says the pattern is directly connected to his publication of evidence documenting misconduct, medical abuse, and constitutional violations inside the Williamson County Jail. The stakes are therefore not limited to account security. They include the integrity of published evidence, the ability to report on jail conditions, and the constitutional rights the filing says were exercised.
The complaint’s language is conditional in one respect: it says the actions “appear designed” to produce those effects. That wording signals an allegation rather than a finding. Even so, the alleged chain of events is serious. If accurate, it would mean digital access was used not merely to view information but to disrupt an evidentiary record and punish publication.
Publication and rights:
The complaint ties the alleged intrusions to Nellis’s publication of evidence. That publication, according to the complaint, documented misconduct, medical abuse, and constitutional violations inside the Williamson County Jail. The filing therefore places the digital allegations inside a broader dispute about conditions in a local jail and the public’s ability to see evidence about those conditions. The complaint says the pattern is targeted and coordinated. It also says the pattern is directly connected to that publication.
The constitutional stakes are stated in the complaint itself. It says the actions appear designed to retaliate against him for whistleblowing and exercising constitutionally protected rights. That is the document’s own framing of the human and legal stakes. It does not ask readers to accept a conclusion beyond the allegations. It asks them to see the connection the complaint draws between digital interference and protected speech.
What the Record Shows:
The complaint is dated November 15, 2025, and is addressed to the FBI Cyber Division – Criminal Intrusion Section. It is tied to the Williamson County Sheriff’s Office. It identifies impacted systems: Google account, Gmail, Google Drive, and LeRoyNellis.blog. It describes the pattern as targeted and coordinated. It says the activity appears designed to obstruct justice, destroy evidence, suppress public reporting, and retaliate for whistleblowing and protected rights. It cites the FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) as a federal reference. The document says it supports an ongoing evidentiary record involving publication interference, account access anomalies, and system-level manipulation. What it does not say is whether any agency has opened, declined, or completed an investigation into those allegations.
The pattern is targeted, coordinated, and directly connected to my publication of evidence documenting misconduct, medical abuse, and constitutional violations inside the Williamson County Jail.