Power Of Attorney Complaint Texas Attorney General Response

This record documents a formal complaint submitted to the Texas Attorney General's Office and the official response received — preserved correspondence, documented allegations, statutory reference for evidentiary tracking and legal review. For statutory reference, see Texas Estates Code — Powers of Attorney and the Texas Attorney General Consumer Protection Division.

Why the timeline matters to the allegations:

Incarceration from January 2024 through July 2025 — 18 months of enforced absence from every decision someone made with a document titled 'power of attorney.' Each allegation in the complaint lives somewhere inside that window with dates, witnesses, and account records attached.

The submitted complaint — in full:

- Date Submitted: August 3, 2025 - Submitted To: Texas Attorney General's Office (Texas) - Type of Request: Assistance unrelated to Child Support

The complaint alleges misuse of a power of attorney arrangement during a period of incarceration from January 2024 through July 2025. Based on documented records, the following specific allegations are named:

- Real estate properties reportedly sold without authorization - Power of attorney excluded authority to sell real estate - Execution lacked notarization or formal legal procedures - Bank account (Wells Fargo) closed without authorization - Representations regarding rental income later contradicted

The complaint requests review under Texas law, including potential violations of fiduciary duty, fraud, and applicable consumer protection statutes. The complainant stated willingness to provide supporting documentation, timelines, and evidentiary materials for further review.

“Execution lacked notarization or formal legal procedures.”

The AG's Consumer Protection Division is a consumer-facing statutory agency — designed for breaches of state consumer protection law, not for private fiduciary enforcement. Receiving a referral sheet matters less than receiving it on the record the AG signed on August 6, 2025 — it now exists in agency correspondence forever, and every follow-up letter after it inherits that date as its anchor.

The Texas Attorney General's response — in full:

- Date Received: August 6, 2025 - From: Public Information Division, Texas Attorney General's Office

The Texas Attorney General's Office responded by stating that Texas law prohibits the agency from providing legal advice, direct representation, or intervention in private disputes between individuals. Instead, the response provided referrals to external resources for assistance and legal guidance:

- Texas Health and Human Services (advance directives resources) - Texas State Law Library (legal research assistance) - Area Agency on Aging (support services) - TexasLawHelp.org (general legal information) - Lawyer Referral Information Service (LRIS) (attorney referrals)

The response did not directly address the allegations or indicate initiation of an investigation. Based on official procedures, this type of response is consistent with the agency's role as a public-information and referral body rather than a direct enforcement authority in individual civil disputes — which is why every line of this page exists for whoever takes it next.

Why this record stays public forever:

Wells Fargo, the property addresses mentioned, the rental-income contradictions, the notarization failures — every fact in this page now sits in public search results. No single government office will act on any one of these facts alone. All of them together are the predicate.

Record context — the sequence in order:

1. Alleged unauthorized property transactions 2. Disputed authority under power of attorney 3. Financial account closure without consent 4. Formal complaint submission to the Texas Attorney General 5. Agency response with referral guidance

This constitutes a record supporting timeline reconstruction, legal review, and potential escalation through appropriate legal channels.

What the Record Shows:

This entry establishes a documented sequence of events — the allegations, the AG's referral-only response, and the entire evidentiary chain attached to them. The complainant can now hand this record to an attorney, a title company, a bank, a journalist, or a court — and none of them needs to start from zero. The allegations now exist on the public record at this URL permanently; whether they are adjudicated or explained away is for the next office, the next review, or the next hearing — not for this page to decide.